Korean solar industry makes unprecedented legal challenge to “green” credentials of biomass energy
Canadian citizen joins suit against Korean government alleging irreparable harm to forests and climate from use of British Columbia wood pellets
Canadian citizen joins suit against Korean government alleging irreparable harm to forests and climate from use of British Columbia wood pellets
Even ignoring the CO2 coming out the smokestack, the new policy sets a lifecycle emissions standard that imported wood pellets can’t meet
Decision is key to protecting forests in the US Southeast, which are being cleared to fuel UK wood pellet demand
Burning wood for power undermines efforts to reduce greenhouse emissions, even under industry best-case scenarios.
Why is the State of Massachusetts offering incentives for wood heating when wood burners are already a major source of air pollution in Massachusetts?
To prevent dangerous climate warming, we need to plant trees, not burn them for energy.
Despite requiring clearcutting of millions of forest acres per year, the Department of Energy declines to assess carbon pollution impacts from a biofueled economy.
Legislating that bioenergy produces no carbon pollution makes as little sense as legislating that climate change does not exist.
We all know burning trees drives climate change, but Senate legislation now being considered would dictate that burning more trees does not increase carbon pollution.
Irrefutable evidence of the forest destruction by the wood pellet industry.

